Supreme Court rules on police and cell phone searches

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A ruling today by the Supreme Court means police need a warrant to search the cell phone of a person who has been arrested, unless there are unusual circumstances.

Recently Memphis police have had several run ins with people who said their phones were confiscated by police officers.

Those incidents had more to do with people who were arrested for recording an incident involving police, but it is possible this decision could have a ripple effect.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, “Modern cell phones are now such a pervasive and insistent part of daily life that the proverbial visitor from Mars might conclude they were an important feature of human anatomy.”

Justices used two cases to make their decision.

One case involved a basic flip phone, while another used a smartphone.

Police in both of those cases used information to connect a suspect to a crime.

Police in San Diego used pictures in from a smartphone which belonged to David Leon Riley’s smartphone as well as evidence found in his trunk to tie him to a gang and a shooting.

A woman named Brima Wurie was arrested by Boston police for suspicion of being involved in selling drugs.

A photo linked to a phone call on Wurie’s flip phone was used to link him to a stash of crack cocaine.

Civil libertarian groups argued that advances in technology mean that the right of individuals to be “secure in their persons, houses, papers or effects” as guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution mean that police should seek warrants before rifling through suspects’ mobile devices.



  • calliphorid

    All who voted are dumb losers. These cell phones help to solve cases and the gps can be used to develop suspects. I hope they become victims of a crime and then they will understand.

    • langor1

      All in favor of unrestricted searches are buffoons who believe in a police state and use the Constitution as toilet paper. Rhetoric can flow both ways.

    • MikeBarret

      Please post the username and password to all of your services, also going to need a record of everyone you called and everyone who called you this month. Plus the GPS location data for everywhere you’ve been. Gonna need those nudie pics of your wife too. You may have committed a crime so surely you can’t object to this?

  • Rick

    “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”

  • Fed up

    Just another victory for the criminals!!!! Way to go Washington make it harder for law enforcement to find missing children, murders, rapeist, drug dealers, etc.

    • MikeBarret

      Let’s put cameras in everybody’s house and car 24/7 including bedrooms. That would solve a lot of crimes too. Do you want to sign up to be the first victim..I mean..participant in this great crimefighting program?

Comments are closed.