New Army Appearance Rules Have Some Claiming Discrimination

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

(CNN) The U.S. Army has released new appearance standards for all members but it’s those that apply to ethnic hairstyles that has some African-American women who wear their coifs in dreadlocks, braids and cornrows upset.

The same regulations apply to all members regardless of race and the Army says the rules are for the safety of all soldiers and to make sure hair does not interfere with equipment.

The Army’s regulations stipulate such guidance as hair “must be of uniform dimension, small in diameter (approximately ¼ inch), show no more than 1/8 (inch) of the scalp between the braids.”

Dreadlocks “against the scalp or free-hanging” are banned.

“Unkempt” or “matted” braids and cornrows are also considered dreadlocks and “are not authorized,” according to the regulations that were updated this month.

It’s that type of language, words like “unkempt” and “matted,” that read to some African-Americans, as code for racial bias.

“These new changes are racially biased and the lack of regard for ethnic hair is apparent,” Sgt. Jasmine Jacobs of the Georgia National Guard wrote in a White House petition she started in late March asking the Obama administration to reconsider the policy.

So far Jacobs is the only soldier to formally complain.

Capt. Tasha Dyer, a recruiter for the U.S. Army, told WJXT-TV disagrees.

“I just believe now they have more details and have gotten more specific, and it removed the interpretation to make it uniform across the board,” said Dyer. “If you understand what the standard is before you enter the organization, you’re going to accept it if that’s what you want to do with your life.”

Male soldiers have similar standards and must wear their hair in a manner which will not interfere with gear.

They must also keep sideburns neatly trimmed.

Sideburns may not be flared; the base of the sideburn will be a clean-shaven, horizontal line. Sideburns will not extend below the lowest part of the exterior ear opening.

There are also new restrictions on tattoos.

The updates in appearance standards were crafted, in part, with the help of African-American female soldiers and are intended to clarify the professional look of soldiers, said Troy Rolan, an Army spokesman.

Previous regulations did not specifically address things such as braid widths or numbers, or the definition of twist styles.

“Many hairstyles are acceptable, as long as they are neat and conservative,” Rolan said, noting the Army has banned dreadlocks since 2005.

If soldiers aren’t happy, they can go through a formal process to request changes to the hairstyle regulations, the Army said.

“We encourage soldiers to make use of this process by sending recommendations and examples of hairstyles which could present professional appearances and conform to the regulation,” Rolan said.

Black female soldiers say new grooming reg is ‘racially biased’

The rules’ conciseness isn’t the problem, say some African-American women and black studies scholars.

The problem, they say, is a perception that ethnic hair that is “natural” or not straightened with heat or chemicals is somehow unruly, unkempt and must be carefully regulated to fit within white cultural norms.

“In a broad sense, it’s just another example of U.S. institutions policing black style,” said Mark Anthony Neal, an African-American studies professor at Duke University. “And it’s not that there aren’t other examples of such policing among other racial and ethnic groups. But, given the fraught relationship between black identity and culture and what some Americans might perceive as ‘normal,’ it strikes a particularly dissonant chord among some blacks.”

Mandating what should be done with black hair is a particularly sensitive matter.

Black pride and natural hair movements have emphasized that all hair types and the rainbow of skin hues are all beautiful.

However, the Army’s regulations, some natural hair advocates and African American scholars fear, might suggest to black soldiers that their tresses must be straightened or closely cropped in order to fit in and be valued.

Read more from CNN


  • TN_Red

    “If you understand what the standard is before you enter the organization, you’re going to accept it if that’s what you want to do with your life.”

    Enough said…

    • Mann Hushh!!!!

      Apparently, everyone on here speaking about black people hair styles, but yet you all claim that you don’t deal with them. Therefore, how would you all even know what goes into black hair? You all the types that hide behind the computers etc. But would not dare say anything outside your comfort zone. A bunch of hillbilly LOSERS! !!!!!

  • Selkie (@kitschybobcat)

    I don’t get what the problem is. Multiple braids are fine, as long as you follow the size guidelines…same is true for cornrows. I get it’s a pain; my hair has never done well as a bun, but you do what you can and you move on. No one has hair so thick that they can’t do *any* of the acceptable styles…

    • Thomas H. Evans

      I believe there were Blacks and Whites in these examples, but your point is well taken. If you don’t plan on following the rules, then don’t join. Sick and tired of rules being changed to satisfy a few, even in our schools, teachers included.

    • Terrie

      “So far Jacobs is the only soldier to formally complain.”
      Bye bye Jacobs! She couldve had a career but she chooses to sit at home & let the govenrment feed her instead of working for it.
      I almost am starting to feel sorry for the blacks.
      Lets hope the top head in the military have big enough nads to not be scared & comply!

  • BASDawg

    One of our oldest and dearest military traditions is griping and complaining. Tomorrow, there will something new to gripe about.

  • Lindsey

    Males in the military have to comply with regulations for their hair females should as well. I’m sorry but dreadlocks and cornrows do look nasty and unkempt!! It appears to be a way to keep from having to wash your hair on a frequent basis which is nasty and stinks.

  • midtown mike

    Sad to see how pathetic blacks have become…….they will never prosper collectively because the only gains they make in society are due to affirmative action and extortion.

  • Chris Williams

    Most of these comments are IGNORANT! Evidently the women were already in the military when the rules were changed…DUMMY

  • Don

    I never wore my hair long before being in the service. I got my first G I haircut and got powdered down as everyone did who joined, I was insulted because I was DE-liced like everyone did. I got over it. I kept my G I until I was discharged. What is the problem now days
    If you don’t like how you are mistreated, don’t join. Its the choice of everyone, black, white, women and men.
    I didn’t have a choice, I was drafted and I loved the service, but I did not re enlist because of the low pay back then.

Comments are closed.