Federal court says no to shutting down Mississippi’s lone abortion clinic

medical medicine health

(CNN) — Mississippi’s lone abortion clinic can stay open, after a federal appeals court Tuesday ruled against a law that effectively would have shut it down — contending that it’s not right to simply pass the buck to other states.

Tuesday’s decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals spares the Jackson Women’s Health Organization for now. Other federal courts also could consider the case, including the U.S. Supreme Court.

It all stems from House Bill 1390, which requires abortion doctors to have admitting privileges at a local hospital.

Three doctors work in the clinic in the Mississippi capital, only one of whom meets this requirement. Seven hospitals in and around Jackson rebuffed the other two doctors’ requests to get the same privileges — not because of their qualifications, per se, but because their “medical practice is inconsistent with” the hospitals’ practices.

As the appeals court noted Tuesday, this isn’t a matter of whether abortion is legal: The Supreme Court “long ago” established that it is.

“The ultimate issue in this appeal is whether the state of Mississippi can impose a regulation that effectively will close its only abortion clinic,” the judges wrote in the prevailing opinion.

The state had ceded this fact, contending that Mississippi residents could still get an abortion in Tennessee, Louisiana, Alabama or elsewhere.

But that didn’t satisfy the appeals court.

“We … hold that Mississippi may not shift its obligation to respect the established constitutional rights of its citizens to another state,” the judges wrote. “Such a proposal would not only place an undue burden on the exercise of a constitutional right, but would also disregard a state’s obligation under the principle of federalism — applicable to all 50 states.”

One ironic aspect of Tuesday’s ruling is that it came from the same appeals court that upheld parts of a Texas law pertaining to hospital privileges for physicians who perform abortions and protocols for abortion-inducing drugs.

That decision found that making some women travel less than 150 miles, because of the regulations within the Texas law, “is not an undue burden.” But forcing them to cross state lines — and allowing some states not to offer abortions while others do — is a different matter.

The judges on Tuesday referred to a 1938 Supreme Court decision involving an African-American being denied admission to the University of Missouri’s law school because of his race. The university system offered him, instead, a tuition stipend to go to a law school in another state.

A common tie between that case and what’s happening with regarding to the Mississippi abortion clinic is that “a state cannot lean on its sovereign neighbors to provide protection of its citizens’ federal constitutional rights,” the judges said.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 10,730 other followers